Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


YourLife (Southport), Cambridge Road, Southport.

YourLife (Southport) in Cambridge Road, Southport is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia, personal care, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 28th June 2019

YourLife (Southport) is managed by Yourlife Management Services Limited who are also responsible for 88 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      YourLife (Southport)
      Brunlees Court
      Cambridge Road
      Southport
      PR9 9DH
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01704535386

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-06-28
    Last Published 2016-11-11

Local Authority:

    Sefton

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

27th September 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This inspection took place on 27 September 2016 and was announced.

Yourlife (Southport) is registered to provide a small domiciliary care service to people living at Brunlees Court in Southport who require it. Brunlees court is a new housing complex consisting of luxury privately owned apartments, communal seating areas, gardens and private restaurant on site. At the time of our inspection, four people were receiving a domiciliary care service in their apartment’s. This was the provider’s first inspection.

There was a registered manager in post; they were not available on the day of our inspection.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe with the care staff.

The staff we spoke with were able to explain what action to take if they felt someone was being abused or neglected in anyway. There were policies in place for staff to refer to and staff were able to describe the policy.

Risks assessments were completed and regularly reviewed for each person to help mitigate the risk of harm and they contained an appropriate amount of detail.

There was enough staff in the complex to be able to attend to people’s needs when required.

Medications were stored appropriately, in peoples own apartments. Most people had chosen to self-administer their medications, however the staff received training enabling them to complete this task safely if required to do so or people’s needs changed.

Staff were recruited safely and checks were carried out on staff before they started work at the complex to ensure they were suitable to work with vulnerable people.

Staff completed an induction as well as other training courses selected by the provider to enable them to have the skills needed to complete their role.

The deputy manager and staff we spoke with were aware of their roles in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and associated legislation.

There was a restaurant on site where people could chose to purchase and eat meals, or some people were supported to have meals in their apartment’s.

People had access to medical professionals such as GP’s, opticians and chiropodists when they needed them. Staff had recorded the outcomes of these visits in people’s care plans.

People told us they liked the staff and felt they cared and respected them. We observed staff interacting in a kind a familiar way with people.

Care plans contained person centred information about the person, which evidenced that staff had clearly taken the time to get to know each person.

There was a complaints procedure in place, and people told us they would have no problem raising a complaint if they needed to. Complaints we viewed evidenced that they were dealt with in timely way, and in accordance with the provider’s complaints policy.

The registered manager was not available on the day of our inspection, however the deputy manager and the area manager were available and we spent time talking to them.

People were complimentary about the management of the complex in general, and said they liked the deputy manager.

Quality assurance systems had been implemented and were being used to audit in areas such as care planning, health and safety, medication, incident and accidents, and training.

 

 

Latest Additions: