Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


White Rose Surgery, South Elmsall, Pontefract.

White Rose Surgery in South Elmsall, Pontefract is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 10th December 2015

White Rose Surgery is managed by White Rose Surgery who are also responsible for 2 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      White Rose Surgery
      Exchange Street
      South Elmsall
      Pontefract
      WF9 2RD
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01977642412

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Outstanding
Caring: Good
Responsive: Outstanding
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Outstanding

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2015-12-10
    Last Published 2015-12-10

Local Authority:

    Wakefield

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

2nd September 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at White Rose Surgery on 2 September 2015. Overall the practice is rated as outstanding.

We specifically found the practice to be outstanding for providing effective services to older people and people with long term conditions. Also outstanding for providing responsive services to older people, people with long term conditions and people whose circumstances may make them vulnerable

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles.
  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns and to report incidents, near misses and any identified safeguarding issues. There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat and meet the needs of patients.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Urgent appointments were available for patients the same day as requested, although not necessarily with a GP of their choice.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in care and decisions about their treatment.
  • The practice sought patient views how improvements could be made to the service, through the use of patient surveys, friend and family test and the patient participation group.

We saw several areas of outstanding practice:

  • The practice routinely screened for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in all patients who were smokers and aged 40 and above; irrespective of any apparent symptoms. This had resulted in a higher than average prevalence of COPD for the practice. As a result of these interventions the practice could evidence a 26% reduction in COPD hospital admissions in the previous 12 months.

  • The practice had an in-house smoking cessation service which was facilitated by a trained member of staff. Through interventions and support offered they could evidence the number of patients who had stopped smoking during the previous 12 months. This had resulted in a 16% reduction of registered smokers.

  • The practice had employed a nurse who specifically focused on house bound patients who either had a long term condition or were elderly. Through targeted interventions, this had resulted in an overall reduction of unplanned hospital admissions in the previous 12 months, 30% of which were patients who were over the age of 80.

  • There was a fully equipped gym located in the practice, with qualified gym instructors to assist patients in improving their mobility, managing body weight and maintaining a healthy lifestyle. This was available to all patients who were registered with the practice.

  • The practice leaflet and other health care advice/information had been translated into Polish to support the 10% of registered patients who were Polish speaking

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: