Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


West Coker Surgery, West Coker, Yeovil.

West Coker Surgery in West Coker, Yeovil is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 20th November 2017

West Coker Surgery is managed by Dr Lindsay Smith.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      West Coker Surgery
      High Street
      West Coker
      Yeovil
      BA22 9AH
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01935862212

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-11-20
    Last Published 2017-11-20

Local Authority:

    Somerset

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st November 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at West Coker Surgery (then known as Westlake Surgery) on 23 November 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the November 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for West Coker Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 1November 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection in November 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice and all population groups are now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff had a record of appropriate training relevant to their role, including up to date training in safeguarding adults, basic life support, fire safety and infection control.
  • There were effective arrangements in place to assess, monitor, manage and mitigate risks in respect of health and safety. These arrangements included systems for addressing Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) safety alerts, reviewing patients’ medicines, the risk assessment of legionella; and a comprehensive business continuity plan was in place.
  • Arrangements for engaging patients with a learning disability and those diagnosed with a mental health condition were in place which ensured they had the appropriate care and support and attended annual reviews.
  • Systems were in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service, including those for up to date record keeping, including for staff training and for significant events; for a rolling programme quality improvement, such as clinical audits; and for engaging with patients, such as through a patient participation group.
  • Arrangements to identify and support carers were in place.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

23rd November 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at West Coker Surgery (then known as Westlake Surgery) on 23 November 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the November 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for West Coker Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 1November 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection in November 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice and all population groups are now rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff had a record of appropriate training relevant to their role, including up to date training in safeguarding adults, basic life support, fire safety and infection control.
  • There were effective arrangements in place to assess, monitor, manage and mitigate risks in respect of health and safety. These arrangements included systems for addressing Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) safety alerts, reviewing patients’ medicines, the risk assessment of legionella; and a comprehensive business continuity plan was in place.
  • Arrangements for engaging patients with a learning disability and those diagnosed with a mental health condition were in place which ensured they had the appropriate care and support and attended annual reviews.
  • Systems were in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service, including those for up to date record keeping, including for staff training and for significant events; for a rolling programme quality improvement, such as clinical audits; and for engaging with patients, such as through a patient participation group.
  • Arrangements to identify and support carers were in place.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

16th May 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This was a planned inspection. However, as part of their registration process with us the provider Dr Lindsay Smith declared non compliance with two essential standards as they had no recruitment policy and staff had not received recent training in the protection of vulnerable adults. The provider told us of the steps they had taken to achieve compliance. At this inspection we found that the provider had taken appropriate action in relation to both of these areas.

We talked with patients who were visiting the practice on the day of our inspection and we also spoke with patients on the telephone to ask their view about the services provided to them in respect of their care, welfare and treatment. Patients told us staff were respectful and professional. One patient said “My doctor is kindness itself, he takes time with me and I feel I can ask him anything. I have been so worried about my health and didn’t want to be any trouble. His kindness has allowed me to discuss my fears and provide reassurances to me”.

People told us that all the staff they had met seemed competent, skilled and knowledgeable. One person said "I have confidence in my doctor. All of the staff here are a credit to the surgery and I have faith in them. They treat me with courtesy and respect, that’s all I could ask for”.

Patients said they felt confident if they had cause to complain this would be dealt with in an efficient professional manner.

 

 

Latest Additions: