Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly, Great Totham, Maldon.

Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly in Great Totham, Maldon is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia and physical disabilities. The last inspection date here was 28th November 2018

Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly is managed by Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly
      Broad Street Green Road
      Great Totham
      Maldon
      CM9 8NU
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01621891209
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-11-28
    Last Published 2018-11-28

Local Authority:

    Essex

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

10th October 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This comprehensive unannounced inspection was carried out on 10 October 2018. This was the first inspection of the service since it was registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in September 2017 when it changed ownership.

The service is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing and/or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided and both were looked at during this inspection.

Totham Lodge Home for the Elderly is registered to support 28 older people, some of whom may be living with dementia. On the date of our inspection, 26 people were being supported by the service.

People and their relatives told us the service was a safe place to live. Risks to people were appropriately assessed, managed and reviewed. Staff had received training on safeguarding adults from abuse and understood their responsibilities to prevent people from experiencing harm.

Staff were recruited appropriately. Full checks had been undertaken so that people were kept safe. There were sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet the needs of people who used the service. Medicines were managed safely and people received them as prescribed. Infection control processes were in place to minimise the risks and spread of infection.

Staff were well supported at the service and received induction, training and supervision to carry out their role. People had sufficient food and drink and were provided with choices at meal times. People had access to healthcare services to maintain their health and well-being. People’s capacity to make their own choices and decisions were assessed and reviewed and they or their representatives were involved in decisions about their lives.

The house was a Grade II listed building which had been extended and adapted to meet people's needs. However, parts of the building, bedrooms and furniture were in need of refurbishment and repair. This was being addressed by the provider.

The staff were caring, kind and considerate. They knew people well and were sensitive to their needs. People’s independence was promoted and encouraged by the staff and they were treated with dignity and courtesy. Staff ensured people’s privacy and dignity was maintained and respected.

People received a service which responded effectively to their needs. Care plans were person centred and reviewed regularly to ensure they reflected people’s current care needs, wishes and preferences. People were involved in having a voice about the service they received and feedback from them and their relatives about the service was positive. People had opportunities to participate in one to one and group activities if they wished. Information on how to raise concerns or complaints was available and people and their relatives were confident that any concerns would be listened to and acted upon.

There was a well respected management team who were visible in the service and well respected by the staff. There were systems in place to regularly assess and monitor the quality of the service. Audits of the service were undertaken and analysed to ensure the service was operating safely. The service was delivering quality care to people who used the service.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

 

 

Latest Additions: