Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Time Dental, Farnham.

Time Dental in Farnham is a Dentist specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), diagnostic and screening procedures, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, physical disabilities, sensory impairments, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 19th March 2013

Time Dental is managed by Dr. Taher Rashid.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-03-19
    Last Published 2013-03-19

Local Authority:

    Surrey

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

8th January 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with people who used the service and reviewed testimonials. The people we spoke with were very happy with the service provided. They told us that they were ‘very pleased’ and that the service was ‘exceptionally good’. One testimonial said ‘the whole team at Time Dental are friendly, polite, cheerful and thoroughly professional’.

We found that people were treated with respect and were involved throughout in planning their treatment. A range of methods were used to ensure that people understood the treatment options available. People told us that they felt well supported both during the treatment and with post-treatment care.

We saw that people people’s medical histories had been assessed as part of their initial assessment process and that there were clear treatment plans.

The provider did not have adequate information available to staff in relation to safeguarding vulnerable adults. We found that staff had not undergone safeguarding adults or child protection training. The provider had started to address this prior to the inspection.

We found that staff received an induction and an annual appraisal. Clinicians were supported to undertake their continuing professional development (CPD). We spoke with people who told us that they felt that the staff were ‘well qualified’.

The practice sought people's views via their patient survey. They also held staff meetings and had processes in place to enable them to monitor the work of the practice.

 

 

Latest Additions: