The Shotgate Surgery in Wickford is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 30th March 2017
The Shotgate Surgery is managed by Malling Health (UK) Limited who are also responsible for 19 other locations
Contact Details:
Address:
The Shotgate Surgery 340 Southend Road Wickford SS11 8QS United Kingdom
Telephone:
01268561888
Ratings:
For a guide to the ratings, click here.
Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good
Further Details:
Important Dates:
Last Inspection
2017-03-30
Last Published
2017-03-30
Local Authority:
Essex
Link to this page:
Inspection Reports:
Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at The Shotgate Surgery on 13 April 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the April 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for The Shotgate Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 22 February 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 13 April 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.
Overall the practice is now rated as Good.
At the announced February 2017 inspection we found;
The practice had conducted comprehensive audits relating to medicine management performance and clinical care. All were aligned to guidance and showed improvements where appropriate.
Quality improvement processes had been established and were jointly overseen by the practice manager and the clinical lead to maintain and build on improvements.
The practice had continued to meet regularly with the patient participation group (PPG). The clinical lead had been in attendance at all three of their last meetings. The PPG told us there had been improvements in how the practice engaged with them.
We found appropriate systems were in place to ensure legal authorities were obtained to administer vaccinations safely.
Staff had received training in how to correctly code patient health conditions. The practice manager in partnership with the clinical lead undertook regular governance checks to alert them of any issues. We found the practices prescribing practices were consistent with the patients clinical coding.
All staff were aware of the practice safeguarding lead and in their absence concerns were reported to the deputy safeguarding lead.
We reviewed practice team meeting minutes and saw learning from complaints and safety incidents were shared and revisited to embed the changes into practice.
Clinicians were apprised of changes to guidance at their monthly meetings. We saw alerts had been placed on the patient record system advising them of changes. We checked the patient record system and saw clinical adherence to national guidelines.
The practice had introduced a policy for communicating with out of hour’s services. We found appropriate patients had been identified, clinical records had been appropriately updated and care plans were in place.
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGPChief Inspector of General Practice