Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Thames Orthodontics, Teddington.

Thames Orthodontics in Teddington is a Dentist specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), diagnostic and screening procedures, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 1st June 2013

Thames Orthodontics is managed by Dr Julian Paul Ward who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Effective: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Caring: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Responsive: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Well-Led: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2013-06-01
    Last Published 2013-06-01

Local Authority:

    Richmond upon Thames

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

7th May 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

People we spoke to told us they were happy with the level of information and consultation they received at the practice. We were told that the practice staff explained everything before and during treatment and in a way that helped people make the right choices.

Records we looked at contained signed consent to treatment. In addition, we saw information about the various treatments and their costs both at the clinic and on the clinic's website. This clearly described the expected costs for the various treatments and also clarified that children under eighteen years of age who qualified for NHS treatment would receive their treatment free.

We saw that there were clear procedures for soaking, cleaning, sterilising and storage of instruments once they were sterilised. We observed that there was a clear process followed to ensure clean instruments were not contaminated by dirty ones.

We saw that staff were qualified to carry out their work and that appropriate recruitment checks and training had been provided. This included a comprehensive induction programme which covered all necessary procedures and policies as well as observed practice.

The practice actively sought feedback from patients through the process of consultation. In addition, questionnaires and feedback forms were offered to patients regularly as well as the invitation to send feedback via their website. We saw many examples of cards which contained positive feedback from patients.

 

 

Latest Additions: