Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Sunrise of Edgbaston, Edgbaston, Birmingham.

Sunrise of Edgbaston in Edgbaston, Birmingham is a Nursing home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 23rd June 2018

Sunrise of Edgbaston is managed by Sunrise Senior Living Limited who are also responsible for 23 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Sunrise of Edgbaston
      5 Church Road
      Edgbaston
      Birmingham
      B15 3SH
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01214551100

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-06-23
    Last Published 2018-06-23

Local Authority:

    Birmingham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st February 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

The comprehensive inspection of this service took place on 1 and 2 February 2018. It was unannounced. At

our last inspection of this service in 2015, we found it to be Good in all the key areas.

Sunrise of Edgbaston is a Care home with Nursing and can accommodate up to 98 people, up to five of

whom might be living there short term. At the time of our inspection, 68 people were living at the home.

Sunrise of Edgbaston is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or

personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the

care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

People were protected from potential abuse by staff as they were trained and understood how to safeguard

them. People had risks to their safety assessed and there were plans in place to reduce the risks, which staff

understood and followed. There were sufficient staff that had been recruited safely to support people when

they needed it. People received support to have their medicines as prescribed. There were systems in place

to learn from incidents and when things went wrong to avoid this happening again.

People had their needs assessed and were supported to meet them by trained and knowledgeable staff.

People had their nutrition and hydration needs met and had an enjoyable mealtime experiences with lots of

choice. The building was purpose built and designed to meet people's needs by having many small quiet

areas for people to use if they so wished. People were supported to access health professionals to maintain

their health and wellbeing. People were supported to have a good level of choice and control of their lives

and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible. There were policies and systems in the service

supported this practice.

People had good relationships with staff, were supported in a kind, caring, and compassionate manner.

People made choices about their care and support and were involved in decision making. People were

supported in a way, which maintained their dignity, and staff were respectful.

People had their preferences met and staff understood people's needs.

There were opportunities for people to follow their interests and take part in a wide range of activities.

People's communication needs were considered and they had support to follow their religious beliefs and

cultural practices. People understood how to complain and complaints were responded to in line with the

provider's policy. People had good care but limited opportunity to take part in discussions about their

preferences for care and support at the end of their life.

A registered manager was in post and people, relatives and staff found they were accessible. People and

their relatives had an opportunity to have say in how the home was run. The registered manager had checks

in place to assess the quality of the service people received and ensure the management of the service was

effective. The provider had a vision for the service and plans in place to make continual improvements.

 

 

Latest Additions: