Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


St James Medical Practice, County Court Road, Kings Lynn.

St James Medical Practice in County Court Road, Kings Lynn is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 17th August 2018

St James Medical Practice is managed by St James Medical Practice who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

    Address:
      St James Medical Practice
      St. James House Surgery
      County Court Road
      Kings Lynn
      PE30 5SY
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01553774221
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-08-17
    Last Published 2018-08-17

Local Authority:

    Norfolk

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

10th February 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at St James Medical Practice on 10 February 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led services. It was also good for providing services for all population groups.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available on the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

The overall rating for St James Medical Practice is ‘Good'.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous rating September 2015 – Good)

The key questions at this inspection are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at St James Medical Centre on 24 July 2018. We carried out this inspection as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice partnership had changed during the preceding 18 months, new clinical staff had been employed and additional management support had been put in place. The practice had reviewed the skill mix within the teams and had employed advance nurse practitioners and an emergency care practitioner offering greater flexibility of appointments.
  • The practice had clear and comprehensive systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence-based guidelines.
  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
  • The practice had implemented a new appointment system ensuring every patient who requested an appointment on the day was spoken too by a clinical staff member. Patients who wished to see a clinician of their choice were able to pre-book an appointment. Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
  • Practice staff told us they worked as a cohesive team to care for their patients.
  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
  • The practice staff felt they were well supported and valued by the partners.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Continue to develop systems and processes to identify carers to ensure they receive appropriate support.
  • Embed the system to ensure that all prescription stationary is recorded and monitored.
  • Continue to monitor and ensure safe prescribing in respect of Hypnotics medicines.
  • Continue to develop systems and processes to encourage and improve the uptake of the national cervical screening programme.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice

Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.

 

 

Latest Additions: