Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Spire Parkway Hospital, Solihull.

Spire Parkway Hospital in Solihull is a Hospital specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, management of supply of blood and blood derived products, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 10th December 2019

Spire Parkway Hospital is managed by Spire Healthcare Limited who are also responsible for 40 other locations

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall:

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-12-10
    Last Published 2019-05-10

Local Authority:

    Solihull

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

26th November 2018 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Spire Parkway Hospital is operated by Spire Healthcare. The hospital has 59 beds. Facilities include five operating theatres, a recovery unit, two in-patient wards, a day care unit, a specialist cancer centre, endoscopy and ambulatory care unit. The hospital provides surgery, oncology services, services for children and young people, and outpatients and diagnostic imaging.

We carried out an inspection of the hospital on 26 November 2018. We announced the inspection because we needed to make sure staff and patients would be available to speak with us when we visited. We inspected the surgical service using our focused inspection methodology. The inspection was prompted by concerns we received about surgery staff being bullied and an unsafe theatre environment. We did not find any evidence to support these concerns. We did not inspect any other core services. Although surgery was provided to children and young people under sixteen years old we did not look at this aspect of the service.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Services we rate

Our rating of this core service improved. We rated it as Good overall. Although we re-rated the surgery core service, our overall aggregated for the service has not changed.

  • The service provided mandatory training in key skills to all staff and made sure everyone completed it.

  • Staff understood how to protect patients from abuse.

  • The service controlled infection risk well.

  • The service had suitable premises and equipment and looked after them well.

  • Staff completed and updated risk assessments for each patient.

  • The service had enough staff including nursing and medical with the right qualifications, skills, training and experience to keep people safe from avoidable harm and to provide the right care and treatment.

  • Staff kept detailed records of patients’ care and treatment.

  • The service followed best practice when prescribing, giving, recording and storing medicines.

  • The service managed patient safety incidents well.

  • The service used safety monitoring results well.

  • The service provided care and treatment based on national guidance and evidence of its effectiveness.

  • Staff gave patients enough food and drink to meet their needs and improve their health.

  • Staff assessed and monitored patients regularly to see if they were in pain.

  • Managers monitored the effectiveness of care and treatment and used the findings to improve them.

  • The service made sure staff were competent for their roles.

  • Staff of different kinds worked together as a team to benefit patients. Doctors, nurses and other healthcare professionals supported each other to provide good care.

  • The service offered seven-day services to ensure surgery patients would receive consistent care and outcomes.

  • People were provided with information which enabled them to make informed decisions about their life style choices and how they could improve the quality of their lives and outcomes.

  • Staff understood how and when to assess whether a patient had the capacity to make decisions about their care. They followed the service policy and procedures when a patient could not give consent.

  • Staff understood their roles and responsibilities under the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

  • Staff cared for patients with compassion.

  • Staff provided emotional support to patients to minimise their distress.

  • Staff involved patients and those close to them in decisions about their care and treatment.

  • The service planned and provided services in a way that met the needs of local people.

  • The service took account of patients’ individual needs.

  • People could access the service when they needed it.

  • The service treated concerns and complaints seriously, investigated them and learned lessons from the results, and shared these with all staff.

  • Managers at all levels in the service had the right skills and abilities to run a service providing high-quality sustainable care.

  • The service had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and workable plans to turn it into action, which it developed with staff, patients, and local community groups.

  • Managers across the service promoted a positive culture that supported and valued staff, creating a sense of common purpose based on shared values.

  • The service systematically improved service quality and safeguarded high standards of care by creating an environment for excellent clinical care to flourish.

  • The service had good systems to identify risks, plan to eliminate or reduce them, and cope with both the expected and unexpected.

  • The service collected, analysed, managed and used information well to support all its activities, using secure electronic systems with security safeguards.

  • The service engaged well with patients, staff, the public and local organisations to plan and manage appropriate services, and collaborated with partner organisations effectively.

  • The service was committed to improving services by learning from when things went well or wrong, promoting training, research and innovation.

We found areas of outstanding practice in surgery:

  • Staff identified innovate ways to providing integrated person-centred pathways of care for people with learning disabilities and those living with dementia to manage their anxieties at all stages of their treatment. This included providing care in environments where people felt safe, identifying how to make their admission to the hospital as reassuring as possible and providing continuous care and support from staff and people they were familiar with and trusted.

However, the service should:

Seek to improve the response rate to the family and friends test (a measure of patient satisfaction).

Professor Sir Mike Richards

Chief Inspector of Hospitals

21st July 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Spire Parkway Hospital, part of Spire Healthcare, offers private hospital treatments, procedures, tests and scans to patients from Solihull and surrounding areas. The hospital offers a range of surgical procedures, cancer care, rapid access to assessment and investigation and a physiotherapy service. Paediatric services are offered to children aged three and over.

Patients are admitted for elective surgery, day case or outpatient care. There are no urgent admissions.

Facilities included 42 beds each with ensuite facilities, including two double rooms, 8 beds in day care, and four in the high dependency unit. There are four theatres, outpatient facilities, and plans are underway for a refurbishment of the cancer care suite. Cancer care was being delivered in temporary accommodation. The hospital also offered services to NHS patients on behalf of the NHS through local contractual agreements and 24% of its activity was NHS funded care.

Prior to the CQC on-site inspection, the CQC considered a range of quality indicators captured through our monitoring processes. In addition, we sought the views of a range partners and stakeholders. A key element of this is the focus groups with healthcare professionals and feedback from the public.

The inspection team make an evidence based judgment on five domains to ascertain if services are:

  • Safe

• Effective

• Caring

• Responsive

• Well-led.

Our key findings were as follows:

Spire Parkway Hospital was selected for a comprehensive inspection as part of a first wave of independent healthcare inspections. The inspection was conducted using the Care Quality Commission’s new inspection methodology.

The inspection team included CQC inspectors, doctors, nurses, expert by experience and senior managers with experience of working in the Independent Healthcare sector. The inspection took place on 21 July 2015, with an unannounced visit on 1 August 2015. The inspection team looked at the following core services: surgery, high dependency unit (HDU) services for children and young people, outpatient and diagnostic imaging services.

We saw an area of outstanding practice:

  • Installation of a new MRI scanner which has a wider bore, more comfortable for patients, with the added capability of treating uterine fibroids with MR guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS), only two of its kind nationally.

However, there were also areas of poor practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly, the provider must:

  • Ensure the hospital maintains complete sets of patient records on site and ensures patient confidentiality is maintained at all times.

  • Ensure robust governance arrangements are in place to ensure consultants adhere to the hospital’s directives when risks had been identified and action required to monitor and mitigate risks.

  • In addition the provider should:

  • Ensure all medications and managed as per Spire Medications Policy.

  • Improve incident reporting across all areas of the hospital including pharmacy.

  • Improve mandatory training attendance for all staff including MCA and DoLS.

  • Ensure clinical audits include findings, actions and demonstrate patient outcomes so care improvements can be measured clearly.

  • Ensure the Lone Working Policy applies to all staff working at the hospital and includes staff working out of hours.

3rd February 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with the duty manager, nurses and other staff and a number of in-patients and out-patients. We looked at a sample of records and observed some interactions between staff and patients.

Patients were all very positive about the care and support offered by the hospital. We spoke with four inpatients who all said they were very pleased with the service. One told us; “They are punctual, helpful, well organised, flexible and accommodating. I am really happy with the service.” Another said; “Excellent care, marvellous, so helpful.”

We saw eleven returned patient survey questionnaire completed for the previous month. These were also very positive, with most responses being either ‘excellent’ or ‘very good’ with the lowest rating being ‘quite good’.

We saw patients were informed about their treatment and were given good care and support. Staff were supported to do their work and the service had processes in place to measure the quality of the service. We saw that the hospital responded to highlighted areas of dissatisfaction.

The hospital was clean and measures were on place to minimise the risks of infection. We had some concerns about particular cleaning practices but were confident the hospital were addressing these. There was a lack of clarity about responsibility for some cleaning processes.

2nd November 2012 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke at length with four inpatients and four outpatients. They all told us the staff were friendly and treated them with dignity and respect. Typical comments included “everybody is friendly, they go out of their way to help”, “I can’t praise them enough, the whole staff team have been wonderful”.

Patients told us they had received good information about their care and treatment at every stage of the process. They said staff had taken their time to ensure they understood the treatment they were going to have and any risks associated with it.

We were told by inpatients they had received good care both before and after surgery. One said “it has been absolutely fantastic...I have no criticisms of the care I have received”.

We spoke with a range of staff working at the hospital. We were told by most they enjoyed working at Spire Parkway, and they told us there was low staff turn over. They said staff worked well with each other to meet the needs of patients in their care.

We looked at equipment used, and talked to staff responsible for its maintenance. The equipment was in good order. Staff responsible for equipment had good systems for maintaining and replacing faulty equipment.

We checked staff recruitment and noted that good systems were in place to ensure staff were safe, well trained, and up to date with their registrations.

We looked at the organisation’s complaints process. We saw that complaints had been dealt with fairly and effectively.

 

 

Latest Additions: