Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Saxena Bowden Saxena, Moorgate Primary Care Centre, 22 Derby Way, Bury.

Saxena Bowden Saxena in Moorgate Primary Care Centre, 22 Derby Way, Bury is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 6th February 2018

Saxena Bowden Saxena is managed by Saxena Bowden Saxena.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Saxena Bowden Saxena
      Minden Family Practices
      Moorgate Primary Care Centre
      22 Derby Way
      Bury
      BL9 0NJ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01614478283
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-02-06
    Last Published 2018-02-06

Local Authority:

    Bury

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

8th January 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous inspection 5 May 2015 – Good)

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out this announced comprehensive inspection at Saxena Bowden Saxena on 8 January 2018 as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

  • The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.

  • The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.

  • Staff involved and treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

  • Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.

  • There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.

  • Staff were well supported and supervised.

  • Patient feedback about the service was overwhelmingly positive.

  • A member of the non-clinical staff acted as a cancer and carers champion.

The areas where the provider should make improvements are:

  • Emergency medicines should be available in case of meningitis.

  • The practice should establish a structure for scheduling meetings with the local children’s safeguarding team.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

5th May 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Minden Group Anchor Practice (Drs Saxena Bowden and Saxena) on 5th May 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Specifically, we found the practice to be good for providing safe, well-led, effective, caring and responsive services. It was also good for providing services for all the population groups.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed. Risks relating to recruitment checks (such as Disclosure and Barring Service Checks for all staff) had been identified by the practice prior to our inspection and were being actioned.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance.
  • Staff received support and training appropriate to their roles, with the exception of regular appraisals. This had been identified by the practice prior to our inspection and further training needs had been identified and appraisals had been planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Some patients said they found it difficult to make an appointment with a named GP in a timely manner. However they said there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a newly embedded leadership structure and staff felt very supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

However, there were also areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The provider should fully implement it’s staff appraisal plan

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

1st January 1970 - During an annual regulatory review

We reviewed the information available to us about Saxena Bowden Saxena on 18 April 2019. We did not find evidence of significant changes to the quality of service being provided since the last inspection. As a result, we decided not to inspect the surgery at this time. We will continue to monitor this information about this service throughout the year and may inspect the surgery when we see evidence of potential changes.

 

 

Latest Additions: