Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Roch Valley Dental, Rochdale.

Roch Valley Dental in Rochdale is a Dentist specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 21st November 2018

Roch Valley Dental is managed by Fogg, Whittingham and Casserley who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Roch Valley Dental
      23 Roch Valley Way
      Rochdale
      OL11 4PZ
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01706524469

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: There's no need for the service to take further action.
Effective: There's no need for the service to take further action.
Caring: There's no need for the service to take further action.
Responsive: There's no need for the service to take further action.
Well-Led: There's no need for the service to take further action.
Overall: No Rating / Under Appeal / Rating Suspended

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2018-11-21
    Last Published 2018-11-21

Local Authority:

    Rochdale

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

19th October 2018 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

We undertook a follow-up focused inspection of Roch Valley Dental on 19 October 2018. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Roch Valley Dental on 15 May 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Roch Valley Dental on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements and send us an action plan. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the area where improvement was required.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breach we found at our inspection on 15 May 2018.

Background

Roch Valley Dental is in Rochdale and provides NHS and private treatment for adults and children.

There is a ramp at the side of the premises for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. The practice has a free car park, which includes spaces for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes seven dentists (two of whom are foundation dentists), 20 dental nurses (four of whom are trainees), three dental hygiene therapists, three receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has seven treatment rooms. Roch Valley Dental is a foundation training practice. Dental foundation training is a post-qualification training period, mainly in general dental practice, which UK dental graduates need to undertake to work in NHS practice.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Roch Valley Dental was the practice manager.

During the inspection we spoke with the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open: Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:45pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice had systems to identify and manage risk effectively.
  • The practice had improved safeguarding processes.
  • Staff files had been reviewed and now contained evidence of photographic identification, indemnity and immunity.
  • The safety and use of radiography had been reviewed.
  • A system was in place to audit radiography and infection prevention and control.
  • The practice had introduced a sedation policy, this was in line with nationally agreed guidance.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the process to track and monitor the use of NHS prescription pads.

15th May 2018 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 May 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Roch Valley Dental is in Rochdale and provides NHS and private treatment to adults and children.

There is a ramp at the side of the premises for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. The practice has a free car park, which includes spaces for blue badge holders.

The dental team includes seven dentists (two of which are foundation dentists), 20 dental nurses (four of which are trainees), three dental hygiene therapists, three receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has seven treatment rooms. Roch Valley Dental is a foundation training practice. Dental foundation training is a post-qualification training period, mainly in general dental practice, which UK graduates need to undertake in order to work in NHS practice.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Roch Valley Dental was the practice manager.

On the day of inspection we collected 13 CQC comment cards filled in by patients.

During the inspection we spoke with four dentists including a foundation dentist, a dental hygiene therapist, dental nurses, receptionists and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

We returned to the practice on 17 May to review their progress in relation to the concerns identified.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday 8:30am to 5:45pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was refurbished to a high standard and appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The practice staff had infection control procedures which broadly reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
  • The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
  • The practice staff had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
  • The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • The practice was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system met patients’ needs.
  • The practice had effective leadership.
  • Staff felt involved, supported and worked well as a team.
  • The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The practice staff dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The practice staff had suitable information governance arrangements.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Review the security of NHS prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to track and monitor their use.

  • Review the availability of, and process for checking equipment in the practice to manage medical emergencies taking into account the guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the General Dental Council.

  • Review the practice’s protocols for the use of closed circuit television cameras taking into account the guidelines published by the Information Commissioner's Office.

 

 

Latest Additions: