Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Prestige Nursing Bristol, Station Road, Montpelier, Bristol.

Prestige Nursing Bristol in Station Road, Montpelier, Bristol is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia, eating disorders, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 2nd April 2019

Prestige Nursing Bristol is managed by Prestige Nursing Limited who are also responsible for 26 other locations

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Prestige Nursing Bristol
      44 & 47 Montpelier Court
      Station Road
      Montpelier
      Bristol
      BS6 5EA
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01179232222
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-04-02
    Last Published 2019-04-02

Local Authority:

    Bristol, City of

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

15th February 2019 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

About the service: Prestige Nursing Agency is a service that provides personal and nursing care to people in their own homes. It is not registered to provide accommodation to people.

The agency specialises in supporting people with complex physical conditions and disabilities

People’s experience of using this service:

• The service had a very experienced registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

• There was also a care manager who took management responsibility for matters related to the care needs of people who used the service.

• The team and people we spoke with were very positive about the managers. People benefitted from an outstandingly caring service. People and families all told us how they were treated with exceptional kindness, compassion and total respect.

• The service was caring and supportive to people. People were very well supported to live meaningful and fulfilled lives. Families and people felt full confidence that people’s changing needs would be met.

• Staff were described as compassionate and they demonstrated empathy, understanding and warmth. Staff had an enhanced knowledge of the people they cared for. Feedback from people and their relatives was extremely positive.

• We received really positive feedback on how staff were supportive, as well as how staff went the extra mile to get care just right for people. One person told us, “Yes they are brilliant; they accommodate me in every way.” Another person said, “They are very lovely with my daughter.” A further comment was, “They are part of our family now.”

• The values of the service were embedded in the service and its staff. People and staff felt respected, listened to, and empowered. There were many ways that the service went that extra mile to exceed people's expectations and hopes for the service. For example, they held regular social days and invited everyone who used the service and their relatives and friends to come. Feedback showed this significantly improved people's physical and emotional wellbeing and reduced their risk of isolation.

• People received personalised care and support specific to their needs and preferences. People and families decided who provided their care and support and when. Each person was fully respected as an individual, with their own social and cultural diversity, values and beliefs. People had their human rights upheld. People had care plans in several different formats to suit their needs.

• The whole service has continued to have a good track record at providing a very good service. The service ensured people remained at the heart of the local community with community links. There were different community groups that people regularly went to.

• Staff were motivated and proud of the organisation. Staff said the service was very friendly and supportive. The staff felt the culture was positive from the top to the bottom. There were high levels of satisfaction across all staff.

• People continued to receive safe care and support from staff who understood their responsibilities to manage risks and report concerns. This was where there were any issues relating to people's safety.

• Medicines were managed safely. Care calls were closely monitored. This was to make sure people did not experience missed visits. People, their relatives and healthcare professionals told us they were happy with the care and support.

• The manager led the team by example, showing strong, positive inclusive and creative leadership. The manager and team focused constantly on driving up quality in the service and creating very positive outcomes for people.

• The service had a culture that respected and

 

 

Latest Additions: