Pimlico Health @ The Marven, 46-50 Lupus Street, London.Pimlico Health @ The Marven in 46-50 Lupus Street, London is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 13th February 2020 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
24th October 2017 - During a routine inspection
![]() Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Pimlico Health @ The Marven on 9 December 2015. The practice was rated requires improvement for safe, with the overall rating for the practice being good. The full comprehensive report can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Pimlico Health @ The Marven on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
We carried out this announced follow up comprehensive inspection on 24 October 2017. Overall the practice is now rated as good in all key questions.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
The areas where the provider should make improvement are:
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
9th December 2015 - During a routine inspection
![]() Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Pimlico Health @ The Marven on 9 December 2015. Overall the practice is rated as Good
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
We saw several areas of outstanding practice including:
The GP mental health team was part of the primary care mental health team, Primary Care Plus (PCP) which was set up by Central London CCG in Westminster in 2011 to ensure safe and supported transitions for mental health patients out of secondary care. A Safer Discharge Protocol was used to facilitate this and patients were offered an enhance level of support. The practice was the first wave of roll out of this service and would feedback to other practices and assisted in the review of this process prior to its wider launch due in April 2016. The review showed 12 of the 24 patients discharged from secondary mental health services to the practice had been reviewed in the last 12 months and we saw evidence of 12 patient records showing how this service had benefitted their ongoing mental health care.
The areas where the provider must make improvements are:
In addition the provider should:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
20th September 2013 - During a routine inspection
![]() We spoke with four people and looked at the patient survey report from early 2013. People described the practice as “a little community within the local community” and were very satisfied with their care and treatment. People felt that they were given sufficient information by their GP and said they could get an appointment when they wanted one. If a person required an interpreter, this was arranged. There was a range of information on display in the waiting area and on the practice website. People received care that ensured their safety and welfare. They were assessed and treated by a GP or nurse practitioner who was responsible for prescribing any medication required. Diagnostic tests were carried out if necessary and appropriately followed-up. There was a daily walk in clinic so that people could be seen when they were unwell. There were systems in place to deal with medical emergencies. All staff had received basic life support training and there was emergency medication available. Staff understood and acted upon concerns about safeguarding. There were effective recruitment and selection processes in place. However the personnel files were not audited to ensure that all the necessary checks had been undertaken prior to employment. There were systems in place to monitor the quality of the service people received and to protect people from the risk of abuse. The provider had to carry out audits and provide evidence in order to meet the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators. The provider obtained feedback from patients and attended meetings with other professionals, including other GPs and health professionals in the area, to share learning and ensure best practice.
|
Latest Additions:
|