Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Penrose Surgery, Walworth, London.

Penrose Surgery in Walworth, London is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 1st August 2016

Penrose Surgery is managed by Dr Sarah Hawxwell and Mr Sunil Gupta who are also responsible for 3 other locations

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2016-08-01
    Last Published 2016-08-01

Local Authority:

    Southwark

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

22nd June 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Penrose Surgery on 22 June 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed with the exception of patient letters initially being reviewed and coded by administrative staff instead of clinical staff.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and that there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day; however some of the patients we spoke to indicated that they had to wait nearly two weeks to get a regular appointment.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

We saw one area of outstanding practice:

  • The practice had an in-house pharmacist who ran regular medicines review clinics for patients with long term conditions, reviewed medicines for patients who had unplanned admissions and also checked all repeat prescriptions to ensure safe prescribing.

There were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • Review the practice procedures to ensure the recording of significant events and lessons learnt are improved.
  • Review practice procedures for reading and reviewing patient letters so they are safe and decisions are made by clinical staff.
  • Review how they identify and record patients with caring responsibilities to ensure information, advice and support is made available to them.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: