Pattom Limited, Alfa House, Molesey Road, Walton-on-thames.Pattom Limited in Alfa House, Molesey Road, Walton-on-thames is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for children (0 - 18yrs), dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 14th December 2019 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
4th April 2017 - During a routine inspection
We inspected this service on 04 April 2017. The inspection visit was announced. Pattom Limited is a domiciliary care agency, providing care and support services to people with varying disabilities and needs. This includes people with a learning disability, a mental health condition and the elderly. On the day of inspection the agency were supporting four people with the regulated activity of personal care. This was the first time we have inspected this service since they changed their registration. The service was registered with CQC in April 2015. On the day of inspection we met the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. On the day of the inspection visit, the provider supported this manager to explain how the service operated and was managed. People told us they felt safe with the staff that came to their home. Staff were trained in safeguarding and understood the signs of abuse and their responsibilities to keep people safe. Recruitment practices were followed that helped ensure only suitable staff were employed at the service. Risks of harm to people were identified at the initial assessment of care and their care plans included the actions staff would take to minimise the risks. Staff understood people's needs and abilities because they had the opportunity to get to know people well through shadowing experienced staff during induction before working with them independently. People were supported by regular members of staff who supported people in a timely manner. Staff were trained in medicines management, to ensure they knew how to support people to take their medicines safely to keep accurate records. Staff received the training and support they needed to meet people's needs effectively. Staff felt supported by management team and were encouraged to consider their own personal development. The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff had a good understanding of MCA and DoLS. When people lacked capacity the best interest process was followed. People were supported to eat meals of their choice and staff understood the importance of people having sufficient nutrition and hydration. Staff referred people to healthcare professionals for advice and support when their health needs changed. People told us staff were kind and respected their privacy, dignity and independence. Care staff were thoughtful and recognised and respected people's wishes and preferences. People and relatives said that the service was responsive to their needs. The service assessed people’s needs so they received support when they needed it. People received person centred care from a service that had a flexible approach as staff often extended support sessions when needed. People knew how to complain and were confident any complaints would be listened to and action taken to resolve them. When areas of improvement were recognised plans were put in place to resolve them. People and relatives agreed that the service was managed well. Management understood the service being provided. Staff and management talked about the vision and values of promoting independence. The support we observed was in line with the vision and values. The provider's quality monitoring system focused on the experience of people. It included asking people for their views about the quality of the service and on site supervisions, which helped improved the service provided to people.
|
Latest Additions:
|