The inspection took place on 19 December 2018 and was announced. We gave the service 48 hours' notice that we were planning to inspect due to the service being small and ensuring people were at the service. The inspection team consisted of one adult social care inspector from the Care Quality Commission (CQC). This was the first inspection of this service since being registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

Next Steps is registered to provide accommodation for people who require personal or nursing care and treatment of disease, disorder or injury.

Next Steps is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

Next Steps is registered to provide accommodation to four people in a house over two floors. There were four people living at the service on the day of inspection.

There was a registered manager in post. 'A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

There was an appropriate safeguarding policy in place, staff had undertaken training and were confident they would recognise and report any concerns.

Recruitment procedures were robust and staffing levels were sufficient to meet the needs of the people at the service and were flexible to allow for extra support when required.

There were appropriate individual and general risk assessments, which were updated regularly. Health and safety measures were in place and we saw up to date certificates relating to the safety of the equipment and the premises.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed on a regular basis. Any trends and patterns were addressed with appropriate actions. Medicines systems were safe and staff had appropriate training. Information and guidance was available to staff around infection control and training was in place.

Thorough assessments were carried out prior to people being placed at the home. Care files included good information about people’s mental and physical health support needs.

The staff induction was thorough and the service provided regular refreshers for mandatory training as well as supplementary training.

People’s nutritional and hydration requirements and food preferences were recorded and adhered to. The premises were adapted appropriately for the people who lived there.

The service was working within the legal requirements of The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff sought verbal consent when offering support and all aspects of care and support were discussed and agreed with people who used the service.

We observed staff interactions which were friendly and respectful. People’s dignity and privacy was respected. Communication needs were taken into account and various methods were used to help ensure people’s needs in this area were met.

All staff had equality and diversity training on induction and were aware of the importance of respecting people’s diversity. There was evidence that people were fully involved in their care and support.

People were encouraged to be as independent as possible. The service was able to access independent advocates for people who used the service to ensure their wishes were articulated.

The service was committed to ensuring confidentiality and adhered to all data protection requirements.

Care files were person-centred and included information about people’s backgrounds, families, interests and hobbies. People were supported to pursue their individual interests and pastimes. Those who lived at the service told us they could make choices in their