Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Naseby Medical Centre, Saltley, Birmingham.

Naseby Medical Centre in Saltley, Birmingham is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 29th January 2020

Naseby Medical Centre is managed by Naseby Medical Centre.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Naseby Medical Centre
      32-34 Naseby Road
      Saltley
      Birmingham
      B8 3HE
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      01213271878

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-01-29
    Last Published 2017-10-03

Local Authority:

    Birmingham

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

25th August 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Naseby Medical Centre on 19 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was good; however, the practice was rated as requires improvement for providing responsive services. The full comprehensive report on the May 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Naseby Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced desk-based focused inspection carried out on 25 August 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to make improvements in relation to patient satisfaction, availability of non-urgent appointments and uptake of health screenings and reviews that we identified in our previous inspection on 19 May 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice continues to be rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Since the previous inspection, the practice analysed the national patient survey result and developed an action plan. To improve patient satisfaction the practice employed a full time GP to increase appointment access, a new phone system was introduced and better use of online services were made.

  • As a result, data from the July 2017 national GP patient survey showed patient satisfaction had improved in most areas. Unverified data from internal surveys carried out by the practice also showed improvements.

  • Previously the practice uptake of national screening such as bowel and breast cancer was below local and national averages.

  • Members of the management team we spoke with explained that following a survey carried out in February 2017 to assess reasons for low uptake, the practice identified a number of barriers. For example, misunderstanding regarding the purpose of screening, literacy barriers and language barriers as well as cultural and religious reasons. As a result, greater awareness of the benefits of screening was discussed with patients. Alerts were added to patient notes which prompted clinicians to opportunistically provide health promotion and advice during appointments.

  • More effective systems for following up patients who missed screening appointments were introduced and reception staff were able to communicate with patients in various languages.

  • Data from the 2015/16 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed that uptake rates for bowel cancer screening had declined; however breast screening slightly improved. Staff explained that they were aware of their performance and continued to educate patients on the benefits of screening. GPs were also engaging with local cancer intelligence networks to improve online literature in various languages.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

19th May 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Naseby Medical Centre on 19 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was good; however, the practice was rated as requires improvement for providing responsive services. The full comprehensive report on the May 2016 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Naseby Medical Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced desk-based focused inspection carried out on 25 August 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to make improvements in relation to patient satisfaction, availability of non-urgent appointments and uptake of health screenings and reviews that we identified in our previous inspection on 19 May 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice continues to be rated as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Since the previous inspection, the practice analysed the national patient survey result and developed an action plan. To improve patient satisfaction the practice employed a full time GP to increase appointment access, a new phone system was introduced and better use of online services were made.

  • As a result, data from the July 2017 national GP patient survey showed patient satisfaction had improved in most areas. Unverified data from internal surveys carried out by the practice also showed improvements.

  • Previously the practice uptake of national screening such as bowel and breast cancer was below local and national averages.

  • Members of the management team we spoke with explained that following a survey carried out in February 2017 to assess reasons for low uptake, the practice identified a number of barriers. For example, misunderstanding regarding the purpose of screening, literacy barriers and language barriers as well as cultural and religious reasons. As a result, greater awareness of the benefits of screening was discussed with patients. Alerts were added to patient notes which prompted clinicians to opportunistically provide health promotion and advice during appointments.

  • More effective systems for following up patients who missed screening appointments were introduced and reception staff were able to communicate with patients in various languages.

  • Data from the 2015/16 Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) showed that uptake rates for bowel cancer screening had declined; however breast screening slightly improved. Staff explained that they were aware of their performance and continued to educate patients on the benefits of screening. GPs were also engaging with local cancer intelligence networks to improve online literature in various languages.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: