Jaunty Springs Health Centre in Sheffield is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 4th July 2017
Jaunty Springs Health Centre is managed by Jaunty Springs Health Centre.
Contact Details:
Address:
Jaunty Springs Health Centre 53 Jaunty Way Sheffield S12 3DZ United Kingdom
Telephone:
08451222021
Ratings:
For a guide to the ratings, click here.
Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good
Further Details:
Important Dates:
Last Inspection
2017-07-04
Last Published
2017-07-04
Local Authority:
Sheffield
Link to this page:
Inspection Reports:
Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Jaunty Springs Health Centre on 30 November 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement with requires improvement for both the safe and well led domains. The full comprehensive report from 30 November 2016 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Jaunty Springs Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 8 June 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 30 November 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.
.
Overall the practice is rated good. Specifically, following the focused inspection we found the practice to be rated good for providing safe and well led services.
Our key findings were as follows:
A legionella risk assessment had been completed and an action plan to mitigate the risks identified had been implemented.
The practice had carried out a fire drill and had undertaken regular fire alarm maintenance testing as a requirement identified in their fire risk assessment.
A system to monitor and manage staff training had been implemented.
All staff had received an appraisal with the exception of the practice manager and the assistant practice manager. A date was planned for these to be completed in July 2017.
Policies and procedures were signed and dated and all had been reviewed in the last six months. Evidence was seen that staff were mostly following these policies. All staff had received infection prevention and control (IPC) training as specified in their infection control policy. However, reception staff we spoke with who performed chaperone duties were not following the chaperone policy as they differed in their account of who recorded the event in the medical record.
Recruitment procedures had been reviewed and appropriate checks completed for all staff and locum GPs including Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for two practice nurses who had been appointed following the practice’s registration with CQC.
We saw evidence a system to monitor clinical staff’s registration with the professional bodies had been implemented.
A process to obtain a complete record of the immunity status of clinical staff as specified in the national Green Book (Immunisations Against Infectious Disease) guidance for healthcare staff had been commenced.
The approved health and safety poster was displayed in the staff area which identified the local health and safety representative.
The practice had completed an audit of broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing to ensure appropriate prescribing.
A system to record the number of prescription boxes containing blank prescriptions received into the practice had been implemented to monitor and track blank prescriptions as specified in NHS Protect Security of Prescriptions (2013) guidance.
A schedule of monthly team meeting dates had been developed. Staff told us they had the opportunity to raise any issues at team meetings and felt confident and supported in doing so.
We saw evidence complaints had been discussed at the full team meeting to share learning with staff.
The practice manager told us the practice were in the process of reviewing ways to engage with patients and had recently recruited one member to the patient participation group (PPG).
Areas where the provider should make improvement are:
All staff who perform chaperone duties should be aware of and follow the procedures specified in the practice’s chaperone policy.
Ensure the practice management team staff receive an appraisal.
Consider reviewing and developing ways to engage with patients further. For example, by developing a practice website and to continue to promote the patient participation group.
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Jaunty Springs Health Centre on 30 November 2016. The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement with requires improvement for both the safe and well led domains. The full comprehensive report from 30 November 2016 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Jaunty Springs Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
This inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 8 June 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 30 November 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.
.
Overall the practice is rated good. Specifically, following the focused inspection we found the practice to be rated good for providing safe and well led services.
Our key findings were as follows:
A legionella risk assessment had been completed and an action plan to mitigate the risks identified had been implemented.
The practice had carried out a fire drill and had undertaken regular fire alarm maintenance testing as a requirement identified in their fire risk assessment.
A system to monitor and manage staff training had been implemented.
All staff had received an appraisal with the exception of the practice manager and the assistant practice manager. A date was planned for these to be completed in July 2017.
Policies and procedures were signed and dated and all had been reviewed in the last six months. Evidence was seen that staff were mostly following these policies. All staff had received infection prevention and control (IPC) training as specified in their infection control policy. However, reception staff we spoke with who performed chaperone duties were not following the chaperone policy as they differed in their account of who recorded the event in the medical record.
Recruitment procedures had been reviewed and appropriate checks completed for all staff and locum GPs including Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for two practice nurses who had been appointed following the practice’s registration with CQC.
We saw evidence a system to monitor clinical staff’s registration with the professional bodies had been implemented.
A process to obtain a complete record of the immunity status of clinical staff as specified in the national Green Book (Immunisations Against Infectious Disease) guidance for healthcare staff had been commenced.
The approved health and safety poster was displayed in the staff area which identified the local health and safety representative.
The practice had completed an audit of broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing to ensure appropriate prescribing.
A system to record the number of prescription boxes containing blank prescriptions received into the practice had been implemented to monitor and track blank prescriptions as specified in NHS Protect Security of Prescriptions (2013) guidance.
A schedule of monthly team meeting dates had been developed. Staff told us they had the opportunity to raise any issues at team meetings and felt confident and supported in doing so.
We saw evidence complaints had been discussed at the full team meeting to share learning with staff.
The practice manager told us the practice were in the process of reviewing ways to engage with patients and had recently recruited one member to the patient participation group (PPG).
Areas where the provider should make improvement are:
All staff who perform chaperone duties should be aware of and follow the procedures specified in the practice’s chaperone policy.
Ensure the practice management team staff receive an appraisal.
Consider reviewing and developing ways to engage with patients further. For example, by developing a practice website and to continue to promote the patient participation group.