Garden City Court, Letchworth Garden City.Garden City Court in Letchworth Garden City is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults over 65 yrs, dementia, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 26th September 2019 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
24th January 2017 - During a routine inspection
We carried out an unannounced inspection on 24 and 27 January 2017. Garden City Court is a purpose built home for up to 75 elderly people who are frail and may also have dementia. As well as the residential beds, the home also has 15 interim care beds for people who were recovering after a hospital stay. The service has a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. There were risk assessments in place that gave guidance to staff on how risks to people could be minimised and how to safeguard people from the risk of possible harm. In our previous inspection we had found that staff did not always respond to call bells in a timely manner. In this inspection we found that this was no longer an issue. Previously people using the service felt that there were not enough staff to support them safely. This was also no longer an issue as there were sufficient staff available to support people. The provider had robust recruitment processes in place. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and would seek people's consent before they provided any care or support. Staff received supervision and support, and had been trained to meet people's individual needs. People were supported by caring and respectful staff who knew them well. Staff were given the opportunity to get to know the people they supported. People's needs had been assessed, and care plans took account of their individual, preferences, and choices. Staff supported people to maintain their health and well-being. Feedback was encouraged from people and the manager acted on the comments received to continually improve the quality of the service. The provider had effective quality monitoring processes in place to ensure that they were meeting the required standards of care. There was a formal process for handling complaints and concerns which were investigated and resolved in a timely manner.
3rd August 2016 - During a routine inspection
We carried out an unannounced inspection on 3 August 2016. Garden City Court is a purpose built home for up to 75 elderly people who are frail and may also have dementia. As well as the residential beds, the home also has 15 interim care beds for people who were recovering after a hospital stay. The service has a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. There were risk assessments in place that gave guidance to staff on how risks to people could be minimised and how to safeguard people from the risk of possible harm. Staff did not always however respond to call bells in a timely manner. The provider had robust recruitment processes in place. People using the service did not always feel that there was sufficient staff available to support them safely. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities and would seek people’s consent before they provided any care or support. Staff received supervision and support, and had been trained to meet people’s individual needs. People were supported by caring and respectful staff who knew them well. Staff were given the opportunity to get to know the people they supported. People’s needs had been assessed, and care plans took account of their individual, preferences, and choices. Staff supported people to maintain their health and well-being. Feedback was encouraged from people and the manager acted on the comments received to continually improve the quality of the service. The provider had effective quality monitoring processes in place to ensure that they were meeting the required standards of care but these did not cover all areas. There was a formal process for handling complaints and concerns which were investigated and resolved in a timely manner. We found the provider was in breach of a regulation of the Health and Social Care Act (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.
|
Latest Additions:
|