Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Frizinghall Medical Centre, Bradford.

Frizinghall Medical Centre in Bradford is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 31st May 2019

Frizinghall Medical Centre is managed by Frizinghall Medical Centre.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2019-05-31
    Last Published 2019-05-31

Local Authority:

    Bradford

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

26th November 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We inspected Dr Jandu and Partners at Frizinghall Medical Centre on the 26th November 2014 as part of our new comprehensive inspection programme. Our inspection team was led by a CQC Inspector and included a GP specialist advisor and an Expert by Experience.

We have rated the practice as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There were comprehensive systems to keep people safe. The whole practice team was engaged in reviewing and improving safety and safeguarding systems. Innovation was encouraged to achieve sustained improvements in safety.
  • There was a holistic approach to assessing, planning and delivering care and treatment. Innovative approaches to care and how it was delivered were encouraged.
  • Staff recognised and respected the totality of patient’s needs, including their personal, cultural and social needs.
  • There was a proactive approach to understanding the needs of different groups of patients and to deliver care in a way that met their needs. This included people who were in vulnerable circumstances or who had complex needs.
  • Patients could access appointments and services in a way and at a time that suited them.
  • There were high levels of staff satisfaction. Staff were proud of the organisation as a place to work and spoke highly of the culture.

We saw two areas of outstanding practice:

  • Children with very complex needs were assigned a named GP and a named receptionist whose role was to assist with liaison with other services.
  • The effectiveness of the practice’s approach to identifying, following up and managing serious illnesses, including cancer referrals, was evident from local performance data which showed it was significantly better than most other practices.

However, there was also an area of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

  • The provider should ensure there is a system to check that patient safety alerts have been acted upon.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Frizinghall Medical Centre on 22 March 2019 as part of our inspection programme.

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as good overall and good for five of the six population groups. We rated the population group ‘people with long-term conditions’ as requires improvement due to performance against some of the diabetes and hypertension indicators.

The practice was previously inspected in November 2014 and were given an overall rating of good.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice organised and delivered services to meet patients’ needs. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider

should

:

  • Review and improve the process for documenting action taken as a result of safety alerts.
  • Review and improve achievement against the Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators for patients with diabetes and hypertension.

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Rosie Benneyworth BM BS BMedSci MRCGP

Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care

 

 

Latest Additions: