Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Eden Care Services Limited, Macclesfield.

Eden Care Services Limited in Macclesfield is a Homecare agencies specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, dementia, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, personal care, physical disabilities, sensory impairments and substance misuse problems. The last inspection date here was 6th December 2017

Eden Care Services Limited is managed by Eden Care Services Ltd.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Requires Improvement
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-12-06
    Last Published 2017-12-06

Local Authority:

    Cheshire East

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

9th October 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

The inspection was announced and took place on 9, 10 and 11 October 2017.

This service was previously in operation at a different address. This is the first inspection from this address and under the current methodology.

Eden Care Services Limited provides personal care and support to people living in their own homes. They operate from premises located in Macclesfield town centre.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

This inspection focussed on the domiciliary care provided by Eden Care Services. At the time of the inspection the service offered support to 88 people, however only 79 people were in receipt of the regulated activity ‘personal care’.

Risk assessments were not detailed and did not always contain sufficient information to ensure that the risks to people using the service were minimised. There were not always clear plans to instruct what action staff should take to reduce the risks to people receiving a service. However, we saw that care staff often liaised with office staff and the relevant professionals where concerns were noted. The registered manager agreed to review the risk assessments.

There were sufficient staff to complete the scheduled visits for each person and people told us that they had not had any missed calls. They told us that generally staff arrived on time and they were contacted if there were going to be any delays. Visit times were recorded in the daily records and these were checked by the keyworkers. People knew to contact the office with any problems. No concerns had been made to the provider about missed calls.

Arrangements were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse. We spoke to staff about their understanding of safeguarding and they were able to describe what action to take if they suspected that someone was at risk of abuse or they saw signs of abuse. People using the service reported that they felt safe and their relatives told us that they were confident that their family members were safe and supported by the staff of Eden Care Services.

We looked at recruitment files for the most recently appointed staff members to check that effective recruitment procedures had been completed. We found that appropriate checks had been made to ensure that they were suitable to work with vulnerable adults.

The care files that we looked at contained the detailed relevant information that staff needed to care for the person including their preferences. It was clear through discussions with staff that they knew the people they were supporting well and they were able to provide consistent care to people and build up positive relationships.

Discussions with staff members identified that they felt happy and supported in their roles. They told us that the registered manager was supportive and they felt that they could contact her and the office staff at any time.

The service had a quality assurance system in place, however not all these checks were recorded, such as medication audits. The registered manager devised a form to capture these checks during the course of our inspection. The registered manager also sought feedback from the people who used the service via monthly face to face checks carried out by keyworkers and spot checks were carried out on staff to ensure standards of care were maintained.

 

 

Latest Additions: