Dr Yuen Fong Soloman Wong, Leeds.Dr Yuen Fong Soloman Wong in Leeds is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 7th February 2020 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
18th May 2016 - During a routine inspection
![]() Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Yuen Fong Soloman Wong (known as Ashton View Medical Centre) on 18 May 2016. Overall, the practice is rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led care for all of the population groups it serves.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
There was one area where the provider should make improvements:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
2nd July 2014 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made
![]() At the last inspection in January 2014 we found the registered person had not ensured that patients, staff and others were protected against identifiable risks of infection Regulation 12 (1) (2). At this inspection we found people were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment.
21st January 2014 - During a routine inspection
![]() We spoke with four patients at the practice, four members of staff, the practice manager and the full-time doctor. Patients told us they were satisfied with the practice and did not have difficulty obtaining an appointment. The practice information leaflet included details of the staff at the practice, the services available, the surgery times, how to make an appointment and an emergency contact number. The waiting room included a good range of neatly organised health promotion and advice leaflets. Information about the practice Patient Participation Group (PPG) was clearly displayed on a separate notice board. Staff were courteous and respectful to patients and visitors to the practice. They dealt efficiently with enquiries and there appeared to be a good rapport among the staff. New patients were asked to provide details of their medical history, tobacco and alcohol consumption and where appropriate details of their carer or anyone they cared for. Patients were offered an appointment with the practice nurse for an initial health screen. Patients with on-going medical needs were prioritised for an appointment with one of the doctors. Arrangements to reduce the risk and spread of infection were inadequate. The practice did not have a policy describing procedures for the identification and control of risks of infection. Some staff had not had training in infection control procedures. Staff said they enjoyed working at the practice. They said the practice manager was very good and they felt well supported. One member of staff said they were, “Treated with respect as a member of staff and colleague.” The practice participated in local clinical audit programmes and also carried out its own health and safety checks. The practice had made a suggestion/comments box available for patients. Efforts had also been made to encourage patients to join a Patient Participation Group (PPG) to advise the practice on improvements to the service.
|
Latest Additions:
|