Dr Thompson and Partners, Goring-By-Sea, Worthing.Dr Thompson and Partners in Goring-By-Sea, Worthing is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 3rd April 2017 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
22nd February 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made
![]() Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
The practice is rated good overall and good for providing safe services.
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 31 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was good. However, a breach of legal requirements was found during that inspection within the safe domain. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice sent us an action plan detailing what they would do to meet the legal requirements. We conducted a focused inspection on 22 February 2017 to check that the provider had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements.
During our previous inspection on 31 May 2016 we found the following area where the practice must improve:
Our previous report also highlighted the following areas where the practice should improve:
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
During the inspection on 22 February 2017 we found:
We also found the following in relation to the areas where the practice should improve:
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
31st May 2016 - During a routine inspection
![]() Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
The practice is rated good overall and good for providing safe services.
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of this practice on 31 May 2016. The overall rating for the practice was good. However, a breach of legal requirements was found during that inspection within the safe domain. After the comprehensive inspection, the practice sent us an action plan detailing what they would do to meet the legal requirements. We conducted a focused inspection on 22 February 2017 to check that the provider had followed their action plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements.
During our previous inspection on 31 May 2016 we found the following area where the practice must improve:
Our previous report also highlighted the following areas where the practice should improve:
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
During the inspection on 22 February 2017 we found:
We also found the following in relation to the areas where the practice should improve:
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
31st January 2014 - During a routine inspection
![]() We spoke with four patients who attended the practice on the day of our inspection. They were happy with the care and treatment provided by the surgery. One patient said, “It’s a lovely surgery.” Another said, “It’s very good. Excellent.” They said staff were friendly and polite and that the doctors and nurses involved them in decisions about their care. Some patients said it was sometimes difficult to make an appointment to see the doctor when they wanted to. We spoke with two GPs, the business manager, two nurses, one receptionist and one administrator. They all said they received sufficient training and felt well supported in their roles. Patients who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse. We saw that the practice had policies and procedures in place to safeguard children and vulnerable adults and that staff were aware of their roles and responsibilities in relation to this. The practice had an effective system to regularly assess and monitor the quality of service that patients received. They regularly sought the views of patients through surveys and used these to improve the service. We also saw that learning took place from significant events, complaints and audits.
|
Latest Additions:
|