Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht, Southend On Sea.

Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht in Southend On Sea is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 22nd December 2017

Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht is managed by Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht & Dr Riazur Rehman.

Contact Details:

Address: Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht 61 Warrior Square Southend On Sea SS1 2JJ United Kingdom Telephone: 01702618411

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Further Details:

Important Dates:

Last Inspection		2017-12-22
Last Published		2017-12-22

Local Authority:

Southend-on-Sea

Link to this page:

HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

28th November 2017 - During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht on 28 November 2017. The inspection was completed as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

• The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
• The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
• Staff treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
• Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
• The practice was aware of their patient population needs and their preferences and worked to accommodate them.
• There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
• Leadership of the practice was strong and the whole staff group worked as a team, with members’ skills complimenting each other.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

​

Chief Inspector of General Practice

21st December 2015 - During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

This practice is rated as Good overall.

The key questions are rated as:

Are services safe? – Good

Are services effective? – Good

Are services caring? – Good

Are services responsive? – Good

Are services well-led? - Good

As part of our inspection process, we also look at the quality of care for specific population groups. The population groups are rated as:

Older People – Good

People with long-term conditions – Good

Families, children and young people – Good

Working age people (including those recently retired and students – Good

People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable – Good

People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia) - Good

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sohan Lal Vashisht on 28 November 2017. The inspection was completed as part of our inspection programme.

At this inspection we found:

• The practice had clear systems to manage risk so that safety incidents were less likely to happen. When incidents did happen, the practice learned from them and improved their processes.
• The practice routinely reviewed the effectiveness and appropriateness of the care it provided. It ensured that care and treatment was delivered according to evidence- based guidelines.
• Staff treated patients with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.
• Patients found the appointment system easy to use and reported that they were able to access care when they needed it.
• The practice was aware of their patient population needs and their preferences and worked to accommodate them.
• There was a strong focus on continuous learning and improvement at all levels of the organisation.
• Leadership of the practice was strong and the whole staff group worked as a team, with members’ skills complimenting each other.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

​

Chief Inspector of General Practice