Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen, Feltham.

Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen in Feltham is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 24th July 2017

Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen is managed by Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen
      12 Hanworth Road
      Feltham
      TW13 5AD
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      02088902208

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-07-24
    Last Published 2017-07-24

Local Authority:

    Hounslow

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

9th June 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen on 12 August 2016.The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report can be found by selecting the Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen ‘all reports’ link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection carried out on 9 June 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 12 August 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

• There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

• The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.

• Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

• Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

• Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

• Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

• The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

• There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

• The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

12th August 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen on 12 August 2016.The overall rating for the practice was requires improvement. The full comprehensive report can be found by selecting the Dr Sanjay Kumar Sen ‘all reports’ link for on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced comprehensive inspection carried out on 9 June 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 12 August 2016. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

• There was an open and transparent approach to safety and a system in place for reporting and recording significant events.

• The practice had clearly defined and embedded systems to minimise risks to patient safety.

• Staff were aware of current evidence based guidance. Staff had been trained to provide them with the skills and knowledge to deliver effective care and treatment.

• Results from the national GP patient survey showed patients were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.

• Information about services and how to complain was available. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.

• Patients we spoke with said they found it easy to make an appointment with a named GP and there was continuity of care, with urgent appointments available the same day.

• The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.

• There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

• The provider was aware of the requirements of the duty of candour. Examples we reviewed showed the practice complied with these requirements.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

24th June 2013 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with six people who use the service. Each person we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the service received. One person said "the doctor is always very kind to me". Another person told us "I'm always treated with dignity and respect. They're very friendly, always put me at ease".

We found that people were satisfied with the overall level of medical care received, and that the provider had appropriate plans in place for foreseeable emergencies. We saw that the provider had taken steps to ensure staff were aware of their roles in protecting children and vulnerable adults from abuse.

We found that people were cared for in a clean, hygienic environment, and that the provider had engaged a new cleaner as they weren't satisfied with the service. We noted that equipment used on the premises was safe and well-maintained, and that the premises had been very recently refurbished, and redecorated to a high standard.

The provider had taken steps to ensure that staff were qualified, skilled and experienced. We found that the provider had some systems in place for assessing and monitoring the quality of the service.

 

 

Latest Additions: