Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Dr Heather Charles, Hackney, London.

Dr Heather Charles in Hackney, London is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 7th November 2017

Dr Heather Charles is managed by Dr Heather Charles.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-11-07
    Last Published 2017-11-07

Local Authority:

    Hackney

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

14th September 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Heather Charles on 5 January 2017. The overall rating for the practice was good, however the safe domain was rated requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the January 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr Heather Charles on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced desk-based review carried out on 14 September 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulation that we identified in our previous inspection on 5 January 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good overall including the safe domain.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was a system in place for monitoring staff training and all staff at the practice were up to date with training that was required for their role.
  • The practice had reviewed and were working to improve the uptake in cervical screening.
  • There was a system in place to monitor prescription pads in accordance with NHS guidelines.
  • There was an active patient participation group in place and the practice were actively recruiting more members.
  • The practice was pro-active in working to improve patient satisfaction.

At our previous inspection on 5 January 2017, we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services as not all staff were trained in basic life support, infection and prevention control, safeguarding and fire safety. At this inspection we found that the practice had improved the way they managed staff training and all staff were up to date with the required training for their roles.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

5th January 2017 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Dr Heather Charles on 5 January 2017. The overall rating for the practice was good, however the safe domain was rated requires improvement. The full comprehensive report on the January 2017 inspection can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Dr Heather Charles on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

This inspection was an announced desk-based review carried out on 14 September 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breach in regulation that we identified in our previous inspection on 5 January 2017. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

Overall the practice is now rated as good overall including the safe domain.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was a system in place for monitoring staff training and all staff at the practice were up to date with training that was required for their role.
  • The practice had reviewed and were working to improve the uptake in cervical screening.
  • There was a system in place to monitor prescription pads in accordance with NHS guidelines.
  • There was an active patient participation group in place and the practice were actively recruiting more members.
  • The practice was pro-active in working to improve patient satisfaction.

At our previous inspection on 5 January 2017, we rated the practice as requires improvement for providing safe services as not all staff were trained in basic life support, infection and prevention control, safeguarding and fire safety. At this inspection we found that the practice had improved the way they managed staff training and all staff were up to date with the required training for their roles.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

6th January 2014 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We spoke with the practice’s GP partner, a practice nurse, the practice managers, who were the registered managers, and a member of the reception staff. We also spoke with five people who used the service including two representatives from the patient participation group (PPG). The people we spoke with here happy with the service provided. One person said, “I am really lucky to have this service as my GP practice.”

People using the service told us they felt that their GP spent time listening to their concerns and explaining the treatment options available. People’s privacy, dignity and independence were respected. People told us they were always treated in private and had enough time with their GP.

People who used the service were protected from the risk of abuse, because the provider had taken steps to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent abuse from happening.

Staff received appropriate professional development. People using the service told us they had confidence in the knowledge and skills of the staff at the practice. People were aware that some of the clinical staff had expertise in different medical conditions.

People who used the service, their representatives and staff were asked for their views about their care and treatment and they were acted on. Complaints were dealt with appropriately.

 

 

Latest Additions: