Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Cygnet Lodge Woking, Knaphill, Woking.

Cygnet Lodge Woking in Knaphill, Woking is a Hospitals - Mental health/capacity specialising in the provision of services relating to assessment or medical treatment for persons detained under the 1983 act, caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, caring for people whose rights are restricted under the mental health act, diagnostic and screening procedures, mental health conditions and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 11th May 2020

Cygnet Lodge Woking is managed by Cygnet Surrey Limited who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-05-11
    Last Published 2017-09-05

Local Authority:

    Surrey

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

1st January 1970 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

We rated Park Grange as good because:

  • All patients had up to date risk assessments in place which had been regularly reviewed by the multidisciplinary team.
  • An assessment of ward ligature risks had been recently completed. Staff were knowledgeable about the location of ligature risks.
  • The safety of patients’ bedrooms had been improved by the upgrades to the en-suite bathrooms and bathroom doors which had reduced ligature risks.
  • Staff had completed relevant mandatory training courses and received regular supervision and appraisal.
  • The standard of patient care plans had improved and there was evidence of patients contributing to their plans.
  • Patients had access to a range of activities both on the wards and in the community.
  • Patients’ needs had been assessed, including their physical health, and they had support from a range of suitably qualified staff including doctors, nurses, occupational therapists and psychologists.
  • Each ward had a patient representative and held regular community meetings to make decisions about priorities and activities.
  • Patients told us that staff were positive and supportive in their attitudes and behaviours.
  • There were good processes at ward level to ensure that patients’ needs were planned for and monitored on each shift, and that patients were kept safe.
  • Staff were positive about their jobs and felt supported. Staff said that the service was well led and felt confident in raising any concerns.

However:

  • Only 55% of staff had completed training in the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. The hospital target was 90%.
  • Park Grange was not completing a full assessment of daily living skills for patients ready for discharge.
  • The provider’s response to patients following an error in detention paperwork was insufficiently clear.
  • Staff used paper and electronic systems to record patient information which was time consuming and presented a risk that information was not readily available to staff when needed.
  • Patients and staff on the Lower Ward were disturbed by having to respond to phone calls and the doorbell for the hospital when reception staff were busy.

 

 

Latest Additions: