Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Castleton Health Centre, Castleton, Rochdale.

Castleton Health Centre in Castleton, Rochdale is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 14th February 2017

Castleton Health Centre is managed by Castleton Health Centre.

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2017-02-14
    Last Published 2017-02-14

Local Authority:

    Rochdale

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

11th January 2017 - During an inspection to make sure that the improvements required had been made pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out our first announced comprehensive inspection at Castleton Health Centre on 3 February 2015. The overall rating for the practice was Good. The full comprehensive report following the inspection on 3 February 2015 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Castleton Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

At that time our key findings were as follows:

Within the key question safe, recruitment and safeguarding were identified as requiring improvement, as the practice was not meeting the legislation at that time. The areas where the practice was told they must make improvement were as follows :

  • Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 which corresponds to Regulation 10 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulation 2014. The registered person did not assess the risks to people’s health and safety and could not evidence that all staff had the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to keep people safe.
  • Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010, which corresponds to regulation 11 (1)(a) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. No policies were in place for the safeguarding of children or vulnerable adults. There was no record of safeguarding training for any staff although clinical staff stated they had been trained in safeguarding children. Non-clinical staff had not been told how to escalate safeguarding concerns.
  • Regulation 19 (1)(a)(b)(2)(3) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010, which corresponds to regulation 21(a)(i)(ii)(b) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The registered person did not operate robust recruitment procedures to ensure they only employed fit and proper staff.

This most recent inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 11 January 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 3 February 2015. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

The overall rating for the practice remains as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was a health and safety representative and we saw evidence of risk assessments of the practice undertaken every three months. All staff had received health and safety training including fire safety. All gas and electrical equipment had been checked to ensure it was safe.
  • The practice had introduced up to date policies for the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults. All staff had received level 3 safeguarding training and they understood how to escalate safeguarding concerns to the safeguarding lead and directly to the safeguarding community team if appropriate.
  • The provider’s recruitment policy included a requirement for the check of professional registration and qualifications, and consideration of a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check. We saw that checks that staff were of good character had been obtained and other evidence, such as a check of a staff member’s identity, and DBS checks for all staff were kept on the personnel files.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

3rd February 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out our first announced comprehensive inspection at Castleton Health Centre on 3 February 2015. The overall rating for the practice was Good. The full comprehensive report following the inspection on 3 February 2015 can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Castleton Health Centre on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

At that time our key findings were as follows:

Within the key question safe, recruitment and safeguarding were identified as requiring improvement, as the practice was not meeting the legislation at that time. The areas where the practice was told they must make improvement were as follows :

  • Regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 which corresponds to Regulation 10 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulation 2014. The registered person did not assess the risks to people’s health and safety and could not evidence that all staff had the qualifications, competence, skills and experience to keep people safe.
  • Regulation 13 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010, which corresponds to regulation 11 (1)(a) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. No policies were in place for the safeguarding of children or vulnerable adults. There was no record of safeguarding training for any staff although clinical staff stated they had been trained in safeguarding children. Non-clinical staff had not been told how to escalate safeguarding concerns.
  • Regulation 19 (1)(a)(b)(2)(3) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010, which corresponds to regulation 21(a)(i)(ii)(b) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. The registered person did not operate robust recruitment procedures to ensure they only employed fit and proper staff.

This most recent inspection was an announced focused inspection carried out on 11 January 2017 to confirm that the practice had carried out their plan to meet the legal requirements in relation to the breaches in regulations that we identified in our previous inspection on 3 February 2015. This report covers our findings in relation to those requirements and also additional improvements made since our last inspection.

The overall rating for the practice remains as good.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • There was a health and safety representative and we saw evidence of risk assessments of the practice undertaken every three months. All staff had received health and safety training including fire safety. All gas and electrical equipment had been checked to ensure it was safe.
  • The practice had introduced up to date policies for the safeguarding of children and vulnerable adults. All staff had received level 3 safeguarding training and they understood how to escalate safeguarding concerns to the safeguarding lead and directly to the safeguarding community team if appropriate.
  • The provider’s recruitment policy included a requirement for the check of professional registration and qualifications, and consideration of a Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check. We saw that checks that staff were of good character had been obtained and other evidence, such as a check of a staff member’s identity, and DBS checks for all staff were kept on the personnel files.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: