Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Berrylands Surgery, Surbiton Health Centre, Surbiton.

Berrylands Surgery, Surbiton Health Centre in Surbiton is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, family planning services, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 1st April 2016

Berrylands Surgery, Surbiton Health Centre is managed by Canbury Medical Centre who are also responsible for 1 other location

Contact Details:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2016-04-01
    Last Published 2016-04-01

Local Authority:

    Kingston upon Thames

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

14th January 2016 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Berrylands Medical Practice on 14 January 2016. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed, however, there was no documented consideration of the risk to patients in cases where the decision was made to deviate from the recruitment procedure.

  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance. Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients said they found it easy to make an appointment with a GP, however, the practice’s performance with regards to patients accessing a named GP of their choice was lower than the CCG and national average.

  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

However, there were areas of practice where the provider should make improvements:

  • The provider should ensure that when a new member of staff is employed, complete records are kept of the recruitment process (including application form, interview notes, references and the results of any pre-employment checks). They should also ensure that in all cases suitable pre-employment checks are completed prior to a new member of staff beginning work.

  • Ensure that a Patient Participation Group (PPG) is established.

Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: