Autumn Leaf House, Solihull.Autumn Leaf House in Solihull is a Residential home specialising in the provision of services relating to accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, caring for adults under 65 yrs, learning disabilities, mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The last inspection date here was 5th December 2019 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
19th June 2018 - During a routine inspection
Autumn Leaf House is a 'care home'. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. Autumn Leaf House provides care and accommodation for up to eight people with a diagnosis of a learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. There were two people living in the home at the time of our visit. The care service has been developed and designed in line with the values that underpin the 'Registering the Right Support' and other best practice guidance. These values include choice, promotion of independence and inclusion. People with learning disabilities and autism using the service can live as ordinary a life as any citizen. The service was last inspected on 24 August 2017 when we found the provider was not meeting the required standards. We identified three breaches in the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. We asked the provider to take action to ensure people’s care and treatment was provided in a safe way and to take action to mitigate risks. Also, systems to continually assess and monitor the service provided to people needed to be improved. The provider’s action plan informed us the required actions would be completed by the end of February 2018. We checked during this inspection and found sufficient action had been taken in response to the breaches in regulations. A registered manager was in post. They had started working at the home in January 2018 and registering with us in July 2018. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run People’s relatives felt people were safe at Autumn Leaf House and told us the consistency of staff had begun to improve. The provider's recruitment procedures minimised risks to people's safety and we saw enough staff were on duty to keep people safe during our visit. Since our last inspection further management and staff changes had occurred. Some new staff members had recently been recruited and they were due to start working at the home shortly after our visit. Staff understood the risks associated with people's care and how these were to be managed. Staff were trained to use techniques to support people remain calm when they were feeling anxious. Procedures were in place to protect people from harm. Staff and the registered manager understood their responsibilities to keep people safe. Staff had received training in 'safeguarding adults' to protect people from harm and described to us the signs which might indicate someone was at risk. People’s relatives felt overall, staff had the skills to provide the care and support peopled required. New staff received effective support when they started working at the home. Staff completed the on-going training they needed to be effective in their roles. People received their medicines when they needed them. However, some areas of medicines management required improvement because staff did not always follow the provider’s medication policy. Action was being taken to address this. Some systems and processes to assess monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service continued not to always be effective. Action was being taken to address this. Staff understood the provider’s emergency procedures and the actions they needed to take in the event of an emergency. Checks took place to ensure the environment and the equipment in use was safe for people and staff to use. People received effective care and support from health professionals. Staff had a good understanding of people's die
24th August 2017 - During a routine inspection
This inspection took place on 24 August 2017. The inspection was unannounced. However, the publication of our report was delayed. This was because following our inspection visit we received further information of concern from a member of the public, which was being investigated by the local safeguarding team and the provider. We wanted to ensure this information was included in the inspection report. Autumn Leaf House is registered to provide accommodation and personal care within a residential setting to a maximum of eight people. There were four people using the service at the time of our inspection. This included people with a learning disability and autism. The service was registered with us in September 2016 and this was the first time we had inspected the service. Prior to our inspection visit we had been informed of concerns received by the local authority commissioners of adult social care services. Commissioners are people who work to find appropriate care and support services which are paid for by the local authority. These related to some people not being supported safely and not receiving their medicines as prescribed. After our inspection visit a member of the public contacted us expressing concerns that risks to people who lived at the home were not being effectively managed to maintain their safety, and alleging the behaviours of some staff was inappropriate. They also alleged incorrect restraint had been used for a person and an unauthorised restriction placed on their liberty. Concerns were also expressed about the management of the service. We informed the local safeguarding team and also the provider who had taken these concerns seriously. They conducted an internal investigation and the local authority had placed a suspension on new placements to the service whilst investigations were being carried out by commissioners and the safeguarding team. This was to ensure all concerns identified had been addressed and people being supported by the service were safe. At the time of our inspection there was no registered manager at the service. A requirement of the provider’s registration is that they have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The service had experienced a number of changes since registering with us. There had been inconsistent managerial oversight of the service since September 2016 and staff told us they had found this unsettling. Some staff did not feel confident concerns raised with the management team were dealt with effectively. Most relatives felt people were safe at Autumn Leaf House, but they were concerned the constant managerial and staffing changes at the service had unsettled their family members. Three separate managers had been supporting the service and a new manager had recently been employed. This person was planning to register with us; however we were informed by the provider they had now left the service. At times there had not been enough staff at Autumn Leaf House to support people and monitor their safety. There had been a large turnover of staff which meant people did not always receive care and support from staff who they were familiar with. The provider had not consistently ensured that people were supported by staff who had the necessary skills or confidence to support people. In addition the provider had not ensured risk management plans to keep people safe, were consistently followed. The manager and staff knew what procedures to follow to report any concerns but did not always follow guidance to keep people safe. Staff had an understanding of risks associated with people’s care needs and how to support them; however these were not consiste
|
Latest Additions:
|