Arbury Medical Centre, Stockingford, Nuneaton.Arbury Medical Centre in Stockingford, Nuneaton is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 5th March 2019 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
1st August 2019 - During a routine inspection
This practice is rated as Good overall. (Previous rating August 2015 – Good)
The key questions at this inspection are rated as:
Are services safe? – Good
Are services effective? – Good
Are services caring? – Good
Are services responsive? – Good
Are services well-led? - Good
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Arbury Medical Centre on 8 January 2019 as part of our inspection programme.
At this inspection we found:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Please refer to the detailed report and the evidence tables for further information.
20th August 2015 - During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Arbury Medical Centre on 20 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good for providing safe, effective, caring responsive and well led services.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
Professor Steve Field CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP
Chief Inspector of General Practice
8th October 2013 - During a routine inspection
We spoke with six patients. One patient told us, ‘’I’ve had good experiences apart from trying to get an appointment. Once I’ve got through to the practice I can get an appointment for that day.’’ We spoke with four staff, the registered provider and two community professionals who had worked in collaboration with the practice. The community teams we spoke with identified that good working relationships existed between themselves and the practice. We found effective communication and referral pathways existed between the practice and other healthcare professionals. Patients told us that their GP had supported them throughout the referral process. We saw that patients had been involved in making decisions about their care and treatment and forums existed to encourage patients to air their views. Systems and guidance were in place to protect children. Staff were able to identify what to do should a child safeguarding event take place. There were no systems in place to protect vulnerable adults and staff had not received training in the safeguarding of vulnerable adults. We saw systems in place to assess and monitor complaints at the practice.
|
Latest Additions:
|