Attention: The information on this website is currently out of date and should not be relied upon..

Care Services

carehome, nursing and medical services directory


Apsley Surgery, Church Terrace, Stoke On Trent.

Apsley Surgery in Church Terrace, Stoke On Trent is a Doctors/GP specialising in the provision of services relating to diagnostic and screening procedures, maternity and midwifery services, services for everyone, surgical procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The last inspection date here was 12th March 2020

Apsley Surgery is managed by Apsley Surgery.

Contact Details:

    Address:
      Apsley Surgery
      Cobridge Community Health Centre
      Church Terrace
      Stoke On Trent
      ST6 2JN
      United Kingdom
    Telephone:
      03007900160
    Website:

Ratings:

For a guide to the ratings, click here.

Safe: Good
Effective: Good
Caring: Good
Responsive: Good
Well-Led: Good
Overall: Good

Further Details:

Important Dates:

    Last Inspection 2020-03-12
    Last Published 2015-10-08

Local Authority:

    Stoke-on-Trent

Link to this page:

    HTML   BBCode

Inspection Reports:

Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.

20th August 2015 - During a routine inspection pdf icon

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Apsley Surgery on 20 August 2015. Overall the practice is rated as good.

Apsley Surgery also operates a branch surgery in the Norton area of Stoke on Trent. We did not inspect the branch surgery as part of this inspection.

Please note that when referring to information throughout this report, for example any reference to the Quality and Outcomes Framework data, this relates to the most recent information available to the CQC at that time.

Our key findings were as follows:

  • Staff understood and fulfilled their responsibilities to raise concerns, and to report incidents and near misses. Information about safety was recorded, monitored, appropriately reviewed and addressed.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Patients’ needs were assessed and care was planned and delivered following best practice guidance. Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and any further training needs had been identified and planned.
  • Patients said they were treated with dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand.
  • Patients told us they could usually get an appointment when they needed one, although they may have to wait for a pre-bookable appointment with a specific GP. Urgent appointments were available the same day.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.

There were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

The provider should:

  • Complete a practice specific fire risk assessment.
  • Record clinical audits in a way that clearly identifies the four stages of the audit cycle.
  • Complete training on the Mental Capacity Act and Children’s Act for all staff.
  • Ensure they always follow their own policy when dealing with complaints.
  • Consider developing a strategic plan to support the delivery of the practice values and any future developments.
  • Carry out a risk assessment to ensure the safety of confidential information within the practice.
  • Develop an action plan to address the issues identified in the national GP survey and Friends and Family Test.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice

 

 

Latest Additions: