12 Hillcroome Road, Sutton.12 Hillcroome Road in Sutton is a Supported living specialising in the provision of services relating to caring for adults over 65 yrs, caring for adults under 65 yrs, mental health conditions and personal care. The last inspection date here was 10th January 2018 Contact Details:
Ratings:For a guide to the ratings, click here. Further Details:Important Dates:
Local Authority:
Link to this page: Inspection Reports:Click the title bar on any of the report introductions below to read the full entry. If there is a PDF icon, click it to download the full report.
11th December 2017 - During a routine inspection
The inspection took place on 11 December 2017 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection of this service since it was re-registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 November 2017under a new provider Heritage Care Ltd. 12, Hillcroome Road is a supported living service that provides rehabilitative care and support for up to 11 adults living with mild to moderate mental health needs. Supported living is where people live independently in specifically designed or independent accommodation but need some help or support to do so. There were nine people living at the service when we inspected it. The accommodation was provided by another organisation and as 12 Hillcroome Road is not registered for accommodation with the CQC, the premises and related aspects were not inspected. The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. People told us they felt safe. Staff were trained in adult safeguarding procedures and knew what to do if they considered people were at risk of harm or if they needed to report any suspected abuse. There were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs and there were always additional staff able to cover in the event of staff absence.
Robust employment checks were in place to help to ensure new staff were appropriate to be working with and supporting people. The risks to people's safety and wellbeing were assessed and regularly reviewed. People were supported to manage their own safety and remain as independent as they could be. The provider had processes in place for the recording and investigation of incidents and accidents. People were supported to be independent with the management of their medicines and there were regular audits by the management team. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People were supported by staff who were sufficiently trained, supervised and appraised. The service liaised with other services to share ideas and good practice. The provider ensured people's nutritional needs were met. People planned their meals, shopped for ingredients and cooked their own food with the support of staff. People's healthcare needs were met and staff supported them to attend medical appointments. People lived in a comfortable environment which was clean and free of hazards. They were able to personalise their bedrooms as they wished. Staff had undertaken training in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and were aware of their responsibilities in relation to people who might be deprived of their liberty. They ensured people were given choices and the opportunity to make decisions. Throughout the inspection, we observed staff caring for people in a way that took into account their diversity, values and human rights. People were supported to make decisions about their activities in the home and in the community. Information about how to make a complaint was available to people and their families, and they felt confident that any complaint would be addressed by the management. There was a clear management structure at the service, and people and staff told us that the registered manager was supportive and approachable. There was a transparent and open culture within the service and people and staff were supported to raise concerns and make suggestions about where improvements could be made. The provider had effective systems in place to monitor the quality of the service and where issues were identified, they were addressed promptly.
|
Latest Additions:
|